Project+Rubric

procedure list is included || The piece is generally well described. Some dimensions may be needlessly repeated. A procedure list is present || Some parts of the piece are not well described. The plans or procedure list may be difficult to follow || The piece description is poor or unclear. Dimensions may be limited or incomplete. A procedure list may be missing. ||  || The resulting piece demonstrates limited skill || The piece has severe manufacturing problems. The resulting piece demonstrates poor skill ||  || https://sciencegeeksrule.wikispaces.com/file/view/Woodworking+Rubric.pdf
 * || **Level 4 - Exemplary** || **Level 3 - Competant** || **Level 2 - Fair Attempt** || **Level 1- Poor** || BelowLevel1 ||
 * ** RESEARCH ** || Research is thorough and very well considered. Insights are clearly stated and help define the project || Research is evident, and appropriate. Findings are explained and relevant to the project || Some evidence of research is present, but not well explained. A simple weblink or image may be included. || Little evidence of research is present. ||  ||
 * ** PLANNING ** || Plans describe the piece perfectly. Plans are well thought out and thorough. All parts are neatly dimensioned. A clear and logical
 * ** PRODUCTION :** ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * **Construction and**
 * Build Quality** || All cuts are absolutely precise and clean. As a result, the resulting product is perfectly symmetrical, functional and seamless with no evidence of "broken" stock. || Cuts are generally accurate. As a result, the product appears quite functional || Cuts appear to be inaccurate. Symmetry and seams are compromised.
 * **Design and Sophistication** || The detail and features of the piece are particularly well thought out. They are aesthetically and structurally sound. || The detail and features of the piece are appropriate. They are aesthetically and structurally sound. || The detail and features of the piece are limited, or somewhat impractical for the project || The detail and features of the piece are quite limited, or inappropriate for the project ||  ||
 * **Finish** || The finish is flawless for the piece. There is NO evidence of relief cuts, pencil marks, excess glue, and sanding is fine and well done. || The finish is well done for the piece. There is little evidence of excess glue, and sanding is well done. || The finish is slightly flawed for the piece. There may be evidence of excess glue, filler, and opportunities for sanding to improve the appearance || The finish is flawed for the piece. Greater care and sanding would improve the appearance ||  ||
 * **Functionality** || The piece functions EXTREMELY well for its intended purpose. Wheels are perfectly parallel and spin smoothly without losing energy || The piece will function well for it's intended use || The piece requires further modification to function properly for it's intended purpose || The piece lacks functionality for it's intended purpose. ||  ||
 * ** REFLECTION ** || Reflections are thoughtful and genuine. Observations are correct. Significant effort is evident. Changes made between the design and construction are explained || Reflections are somewhat thoughtful and genuine. A few observations are correct. Modest effort is evident. Changes made between the design and construction are noted but not explained. || Few reflections present. Some effort is evident to describe learning which took place. Changes made between the design and construction are not explained. || Few reflections and observations made. Very little effort made to reflect on the learning that took place. ||  ||